![]() It's open, in fact, to anyone who is on the network. It'll plug into any monitor and we suddenly that HDMI connection is available over wireless. No! Let's make a $35 dongle that capitalizes on the fact that HDMI has finally won. ![]() We could wait for $1000 receivers to include Wireless Display functionality, or build it into HDTVs. Until one of the world's wireless display formats is finally declared the winner, they'll keep making set-top boxes portable computers to connect to our TVs. ![]() What we really want is to use our TVs as wireless displays and use the power of our phones, tablets, and computers. (I did the XBMC Airplay thing instead.)īut each of these devices is a darn-near full computer with an OS, and storage, and a life and ecosystem of its own. What's the best way to control this screen? So far, that's the TV (if you own one.) If TVs go away, it'll be the largest monitor in the house. The world's big technology companies clearly want to control the largest screen in the house. You can agree or disagree in the comments, but here's their idea - most of us don't need set-top boxes. By plugging my Raspberry Pi running RaspBMC into my Receiver and using it just for Airplay, I was effectively using it as a Chromecast. In fact, I put together a poor man's "AirPlay Raspberry Pi" Chromecast last year. I didn't realize I needed one until I realized that I've been chasing the idea for years. It's one of those perfect little "duh! Why didn't someone do that before?" ideas. The Google Chromecast is simple and brilliant.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |